We will present today a summary of half a year from the moment we developed the devices online,
and Sasha made a summary of everything that has happened so far, and the system will be available to me in the future.
This is basically the summary, and it also begins with all the work we have done and all the developments we want to do.
We will conclude the last half year.
Let's hope it's a clear conclusion.
Yes, we have reached the request. I don't know what the budget will be, but the request has been made.
Sasha.
Okay, so I will present data collected from December 31 to May 2022.
It is important to make the distinction that there are data collected through the closed markets,
and they were collected separately because they collected different information.
As for the information collected through free text, I will show you how we collected it and how we collected it,
so there is a distinction between two sources of information collected.
So what happened since December?
The team of Shamir was responsible for the collection, collection and distribution of the information that was collected
through the open market, which was designed to prevent the spread of the coronavirus.
It was published in December, and in December we started working on it, and this is basically the process of the work.
On a daily basis, we received two reports, a daily report, which included only the results that were received on the previous day,
this report that was received on May, and a cumulative report that was added to it every day.
And every day we focused and summarized the daily reports,
so that the epidemiology department can see what happened on the previous day,
and we also made a cumulative report that was added every day for the entire period.
And how we focused this information and what we presented,
so we took the reports that arrived on the day, we opened them to age groups,
and we presented the case of the coronavirus infection,
and we took the information that arrived as a free text,
and we actually translated the free text into Medra documents, which are valid Medra documents,
we translated them into groups that I will show you in a moment,
and actually also from the free text we took the information that was related to duration, onset, or re-challenge,
in the documents that this information existed, not in all the documents this information appeared,
but in the documents that this information existed, so we actually also realized and analyzed it in detail.
And today we made a report to the epidemiology department,
which I think we will talk about here, and we will just see how the daily report looks,
which as you can see here, every day we sent a few reports,
in total they were received by each age group,
a few reports on severe infections that we defined as a virus infection,
how old they were and in which age group they were diagnosed,
and how many reports actually received a free text,
this is the number of reports, where in each report there can be a few results,
so here it is based on the number of reports that in general received a free text,
and here, because it is cumulative, for the entire period up to that date,
we counted here the number of reports that were received by each of the groups,
overall the severe reports, overall the reports, and not the reports,
but the reports that we identified through the free text.
Okay, and here in general the overall results of all the reports that were received through the test,
but not all the reports were valid, there were reports that they were clear,
there was no reliable information, or some other reports,
that is, here we actually suggested how many there are overall,
and how many of them are the valid reports that can be distributed from some source of information.
Okay, so we made this test every day,
and once a week we actually focused,
we did a kind of test,
and it is clear that in the test there are closed sites,
and there are sites that can be used to collect free text,
so for about a week we actually focused on all the closed sites,
okay, and we opened them to age groups,
so that the epidemiology section could actually see the weekly rate,
which is cumulative, up to that day.
Okay, we did it every Thursday,
so from the beginning of the test to Thursday of that week,
this is the sum of all the closed sites,
okay, how many cases of hemorrhage there were,
and how it was distributed in age groups.
In addition to this, we focused on the information that came through the test
regarding cases of constipation,
that is, the testers actually suggested if they were infected or infected,
we entered the infection system,
we did not enter all the cases of constipation,
but only those who are in this age group,
those who are infected, those who are from the age of 5 to 17,
and we actually added the relevant medical information
regarding that infection,
this information was added,
and actually focused on a Jewish test,
and then it was actually distributed to age groups
that closed the case before the age group entered,
and at the end of the age group,
after the test results were received,
we distributed the age group test results
and distributed them to all the friends,
so this is another activity of information processing,
this time for the sake of the work of the Jewish Foundation
that was established for the sake of discussion in these cases of children,
and now I want to take a little break,
this is something that I think is more familiar today
from our daily activity in front of the section,
it is important to me to tell you a little about what we actually did
in the case of free text discussions,
so in the context of the text,
the subject matter,
we really were given the opportunity to write free text,
and we thought it was very important to add this information,
because through this information,
we can actually detect events or signals
that are not known to us,
so we will not be able to upload these events
through closed sites,
and therefore we thought it was important to add this information.
What is important here to note is that the information that I added
and compared to it,
and then I summarized it,
and I will show you the results later,
is only information that is not known,
or that does not appear on the screen to the doctor of the vaccine,
that is, something that renews the knowledge to us,
or some phenomenon that is known,
only the characteristics of it are different from what is described in the text.
Okay, if we see, for example, a phenomenon that is a short-term illness,
and if it is also like a headache or a headache,
which is excellent in the immune system,
but the patient has been suffering from this phenomenon for half a year,
so although this phenomenon is known,
I still summarized it in the information that I added,
and then summarized it.
It is very important to note that because the symptoms are found as a natural language,
because the symptoms are found as a natural language,
so each symptom, or not each symptom,
but many of the symptoms were multiplied by a number of phenomena
that are combined in one sentence.
Okay, and actually we need to divide the long sentence into separate symptoms
and divide each symptom into a separate one, okay?
In fact, we divided them into individual symptoms.
And at the next stage, as soon as we divided it into symptoms,
we divided it according to a measure,
which is a word for valid and accepted regulatory action,
and we divided it into three levels,
which is the highest level of resolution,
the term itself, from the natural language,
the preferred term,
and the category that we actually took from the category
in which the division works,
categories of the Ministry of Health,
and if there were symptoms of on-seduration very-challenge,
then we also divided it,
you will see how it is done.
On the level, I would like to talk less,
because I don't want us to spend so much time,
but here the point in this context is that it is actually some kind of word
that allows classification, evaluation and presentation,
and it actually allows regulatory action
in the translation of a natural language
to medical procedures, okay?
So we used this word.
This word is taken from the system
that is being used in the Ministry of Health.
And here, for example,
the review turned into a day, two days, and it was hard to imagine, okay?
So when I went to look for the information on the review that appeared,
there was a report that it was a day,
so when I compared it,
I compared it to a day of a terrible oligomaniac, okay?
And here you can see the categories,
the LLT, day, and the category of the Ministry of Health.
Okay, here I showed you a little bit
how from one review,
it is possible to present quite a wide range of information.
Here, for example, a half-hour review after the first vaccination,
which means half an hour, we have an onset,
leg cramps,
cramps in the hands, pain in the face,
so all of this is received by the LLT and PT,
and there is a continuation until these days,
which means that they have something that is actually,
from the moment of vaccination until the moment of the vaccination,
12 months have passed,
and actually the result is ongoing,
that is, it does not have, in terms of time,
it does not have an end,
at the moment of vaccination, it has not yet ended,
and so I compared it as ongoing.
Okay, and here, in this part of the table,
I compared,
actually, when they read the review here,
it says that it was before the first vaccination and the second,
it says that there was some kind of re-challenge.
Okay, all of these things were considered
for the need for future improvement of the causal connection,
because these are things that can be supported
in establishing the causal connection between the vaccination and the results.
Okay?
On the other hand, we were very helpful
in Unit 800-200, which was on our list,
where two researchers from the natural language field were on our list,
and a professional manager who actually handled them,
and together with them we developed a tool
for automatic control of closed sites,
okay, this tool is already working,
and it actually took us a long time to build lines,
systematically and quickly,
when we actually explained to them
what our needs are,
what kind of developments we are interested in,
and the result of this work on closed sites,
this tool works,
is such that this tool actually knows how to create graphs
according to the developments we are interested in.
In addition to working on closed sites,
we started working with them
on some kind of development and improvement of the causal connection,
with the thought that this tool
will be able to do exactly what I did manually,
all of these statements from natural expressions,
sorry, from natural expressions,
and it may also be that it will be able to recognize
all the features of the on-site duration and re-challenge,
which are relevant in the case of vaccines,
and for this purpose it was important to teach the system
to recognize natural language,
which represents some medical phenomenon,
and to translate it into the correct measure,
to translate it into the correct measure,
okay, and after we thought about how we could do this,
first of all, we presented to the system
everything I actually did,
some kind of action of statements from natural language
that is represented by measures,
but it was not enough,
because there were not enough statements
that the system could learn from,
and so what we did was,
we went to medical forums,
and we actually started translating
results that appeared as errors in medical forums,
which were recorded by people,
what is called laypersons,
we started translating them into measures,
all kinds of results that we met in the forums,
we translated them into appropriate measures, okay?
So this is actually another process
that we did on a scale,
in order to build some way
that in the future can do it automatically,
and now I really want to briefly
mention the results of the closed forums,
it's actually some kind of action
that we did temporarily,
the last meeting was held in March,
and now, from March until now,
there were no dramatic changes,
and so we will really go over it briefly,
okay, so in total,
8,000 comments were received,
not all of the comments are valid,
as we said,
after we hated them,
and we downloaded complaints and empty comments,
so we actually received 6,259 comments,
in total, in this whole period,
which is their spread to age groups,
so this is the share,
this is a share that is kept
between 60 and 40%,
that is, for the sake of the girls,
we receive more women, sorry,
more complaints from women than from men,
and the share is about 60-40,
or 70-30,
and this is kept also in the complaints
in the closed forums,
and also in the free text.
The same thing with the spread of complaints,
in general, the complaints are spread
so that 20% are related to the first comment,
20% to the second comment,
40% to the third comment,
which means that this is something that is consistent,
and 20% to the fourth comment,
at the time of the results,
which you will see,
single cases of complaints about
complaints in return,
that there we will receive less complaints
in this group,
because the fourth comment group
was more advanced,
and therefore also less reported these complaints.
But in general, this is the spread of complaints.
This is the spread of the significant complaints
of girls of the age group,
and in total,
they were received as 173
in all age groups,
when the complaints
in this age group
were actually
passed by some authority
and these complaints were not passed by authorities,
but were simply considered as complaints
about the transfer to a nursing home
at an older age,
in the age group of the elderly.
Here is a summary of categories,
which we actually divided
the closed schools into categories,
in order to present
the missing categories,
as 70% to 80% of the complaints
that were received through closed schools
were of local and general nature,
and in order to bring down
more complaints,
more categories,
changes in the middle,
allergies,
cardiovascular complaints, and so on.
So the following complaints
basically show what happened after each term,
and the complaints are quite similar to each other,
when after each term
local and general complaints are brought in,
and more complaints are less reported.
So I will talk a little about this,
because the complaints are quite similar,
and this distribution is maintained
after each term.
Let's move on to this.
These complaints,
show the separation between
sugar and honey,
and again show that
the schools are closed after each term.
As we saw in the general summary,
there are also divisions
of categories of complaints.
We see that 75%
are reported by women,
and 30 to 40%
are reported by men,
as opposed to changes in the middle,
where 100% of these complaints
are reported by women.
So this division is maintained
between the categories,
first, second, third, and fourth.
This is something we already know
from the previous summary.
Now I will talk about something
that we haven't shown yet,
which is what is received
as a free text.
Right now we will only talk about these complaints.
Overall, we added
2,075 complaints,
not complaints, but complaints
after the complaints were divided into separate categories.
Overall, we added 2,075 complaints,
which was their number distribution.
In this meeting,
I will discuss the most common complaints.
We have here a summary
that we haven't shown yet,
and that we haven't dealt with yet,
so we will only talk about these five categories,
about complaints that fell into these five categories.
These five categories
are 70% of all complaints
that were received as a free text,
and each of them was 10%
of all complaints
that were received as a free text,
of all complaints that were received as a free text.
So again, this formula says
that this division
is maintained
as 70% of complaints
that were received as a free text
and 30% of complaints.
Also here it is important
to point out something that I noticed
in the free text and in the closed sites,
that 90% of complaints
are from adults, but there is something
that surprised me a little,
that this group of teenagers
is 17% smaller
than the group of small children,
although what I remember
and what we focused on earlier in March,
the rate of protection
in this group
is actually higher
than the rate of protection in the group of children.
And still, this group of teenagers
in terms of their contribution
to the action of the complaints
compared to the group of children.
Okay, this is something that was maintained
beyond the complaints
that are not really obvious to children,
which are the complaints of the divisions
in the closed sites,
and that there is really support for this group
Okay?
So, these complaints,
you will see that they are less obvious
in all the categories that I mentioned,
in the neurological categories,
which are general and so on,
because there is some
consistency.
Again, this is actually
all the complaints,
okay, all the complaints, without going into it,
this is a change of complaints that we have already mentioned.
It is kept both in the free text
and in the closed sites.
Here I wanted to see
what kind of complaints,
was there a difference in the complaints
that were caused by complaints and complaints,
and what was the difference in the complaints?
Here we actually saw that
there is a small part of the complaints
and complaints in the closed sites,
and here, among the men, we suddenly saw
cardiovascular complaints,
which were 14% of all the complaints
that were caused by complaints, and they did not appear here.
Okay, so this is the only difference,
between the complaints and the complaints.
And now I want to start to remember,
so far I have covered all the complaints
that were caused by the free text,
and now I want to focus on the category category,
so for now I will talk about neurological complaints,
okay, that were covered as neurological,
once again the format returns.
Wait a minute,
Emilia, until when were you with us?
I can be with you until 10 to 1.
So maybe...
I am happy to receive this note.
It is simply...
Wait a second, Emilia,
one word.
Sasha, I will tell you in a second,
first of all, this is the opportunity,
this amazing stage, one of them,
to thank Sasha for the outstanding work she did,
from December 2021,
when we first introduced her,
we did not introduce Sasha, we received warm recommendations,
and believe me, all the recommendations we received
are an understatement of what she really is.
Believe me.
I agree with every word.
The work is outstanding,
right, together with the team,
the work of cooperation,
there is no doubt that your experience, Sasha,
as the responsible for the COVID-19 at the time of natural selection,
also definitely made the difference,
and you know what, Emilia,
I also thank you and your team
for the trust you gave us,
the trust and all that we did and are doing together,
that is also incomprehensible to her,
and really, I think that
we, what can we say, Maya and I,
saw the performance last night,
and it is simply amazing.
Emilia, the performance is yours, it is the Ministry of Health,
they are here with wisdom.
I am happy to receive it.
We can really spread it to other hospitals,
because now the point was in coronavirus hospitals,
and therefore also because the budget has been received and everything,
but really, we can learn in general
from what has been done here.
I think, Emilia, look,
this is an eye-opener.
I think, Emilia, it shows that if it was possible
to present it to Sharon,
it could be excellent.
I think, look, we have status meetings,
in which status meetings
participate both medical doctors
and professional doctors.
If you will allow me to show it, I will show it to Yovval,
who presides over these meetings, I will ask him
if it fits such a forum or a more complicated forum,
because really, there are amazing things here.
Our goal, my brother and I,
is to continue the cooperation between us.
Therefore, I would not go for something complicated,
I would not go for something broad,
but rather only for something complicated.
In my opinion, we will spread it more widely.
By the way, there is another topic,
and it is the topic of the meetings
between the team with Michal Stein
and the team of the children,
which also, as Sasha said,
and it really adds a lot,
are talking about the future.
There are 155 debates
about major, that is, who will have to deal with the elderly.
There is no doubt
that there is room to do it,
just like we did with the children.
Mati, I can only, before Emilia goes,
Emilia, I will stop remembering
all the divisions between the categories.
What is important to me is that, really,
before you go, I will give you something that fits.
First of all, here I showed the groups,
but there is also the expertise, okay?
We can actually...
Sasha, one more second, one more second.
But it is important.
Emilia, I really, really ask
that you contact Tom, Tom Schlager,
what Tom, the time that Tom and his team
have dedicated here to the royal building,
it is not impossible for him.
Tom, who worked with us,
but we are not his direct clients,
and you know what, they also need to receive
support from us.
In my opinion, it is impossible for them to stop
what they are doing, it is amazing,
because really, through cooperation with them,
they are also the ones who encouraged them.
So don't go, if you don't care,
I will definitely invite him
to the same discussion with Sharon.
Sure, sure, great idea, great idea.
It's okay if I continue,
just the, let's say, the renewal
that we found in these notes.
Okay, Mati, can I continue?
Okay, so the next step is actually
I took all the neurological results
and actually looked at the water, the pithies,
what are the more shallow results,
what were the most shallow results, okay?
These are the neurological results
that were found at a high level.
And actually, again, I chose to deal with them
and less to look at all the information
of the less shallow results.
And I saw that actually when I took these results
and measured their duration,
so here was really a surprise,
because in some of the notes,
80 percent, yes, there was information
about duration, okay?
In 85 percent, in 85 cases,
22 percent of all the studies in this category
there was some information about the duration of the result.
And in most cases,
they were based on long results,
which continued for over a month.
Okay, I considered a month as some kind
because I thought that for neurological results
there is some probability that they will pass
within a month,
and as soon as we look over a month,
then it's something that really affects
on something we didn't know before.
And note, only 12 percent
were results that continued,
that lasted between a month and three months.
Okay, so that means that the studies
that were based on the duration
were mostly based on long results.
Okay, and I actually took
and looked at the same group of studies
that were based on this information,
and I wanted to see what the results were.
So here is a sample that I did,
and I actually saw that there were doubts,
there were doubts, there were hypostases,
complications, complications, paresthesias,
and so on, which most of the time
were longer than three months.
Okay, there were also results of more than 12.
Look, as 30 percent of the results
actually suggested a duration that was more than a year,
and here in this group there are 13,
months, 15 months,
and some of them also included ongoing data.
That is, 65 percent of them,
actually I suggested the duration,
but in 65 percent of the cases
there was actually no end.
They said, already five months hurt me,
and it still remains.
That is, we don't really know
the results from the end.
Okay.
Because most of the studies suggested that it was ongoing.
Okay, but we can already say that there are results
that last at least three, six, nine,
or 12 months.
Okay.
Here I, what is here?
Okay, so these are the results that I actually
identified as lasting over a month.
Okay, so the average of the average challenges,
that is, about seven percent,
were reported on some kind of recovery or recovery of the symptom
after another examination.
Okay, and here I also looked at who actually,
but because of the small numbers,
so I think that this result of the average challenges
does not represent the duration of the results
that were actually reported by a relatively large number
I looked at the results of the problems in the recovery.
Okay, and the only thing is that we actually
managed to go down in the resolutions and see
what exactly the results were talking about.
The order of a long recovery or
a damaged or a strong recovery.
Disorder is every time they say
that there is some change, but we did not specify exactly what the change was.
Here the problem of order,
recovery or short recovery,
which is 80% of the complaints that were received
in this category.
I will now talk about ...
Here, this gap is actually, again,
I tried to look and understand
this, and I decided to put the
limit in a week, because
so far it has been known that these results
are short-term results of a number of days,
and I actually decided to make a spot
on durations that are over a week, on long results,
that people said that the change
was not of a number of days or a week,
but more than that.
And I actually counted these cases and saw
that there are not a few cases of errors
that are continued for a number of months.
And again, I did the same thing.
I took and looked at which cases
are we talking about, what are the cases that are actually continued
over a period of time.
So some people said that they do not receive
a recovery, that their recovery is very heavy
and long, and they are not ready
for recovery.
This is, for example, most of the cases
that talked about long-term results,
they actually voted on the errors of this type.
There were also re-challenges,
as 10% of the votes voted
that there was a re-challenge, that is,
the problem was solved, and then
they experienced the same changes again
and again.
I think that 10% is already starting to be
pretty good, and it does show
some, it strengthens the connection between
what is expected of the recovery, if there is a re-challenge.
The same thing I did in Shrir Sheled,
in the results of Shrir Sheled, so first of all
I removed the broken results that they voted on.
Now, it is important to say that these results
are in the doctor's room, except for the back pain,
which does not appear there, but it is
clearly visible.
Only the difference here
in the evaluation of the room is that
in the room, in a well-designed way, these results
decrease after a few days.
And as we saw, and this is actually
the renewal of this work, is that
there are many reports here
that there were only 5%
of results that they continued between
a week and a month, and the rest were
much worse.
And these are actually the,
and these are the three results that
appeared the most, as long as
ulcers, myalgias, arthralgias and pain
in the uterus.
And it's not pain in the uterus,
it's just pain in the uterus, because pain in the uterus
does not belong to this category.
There were also a few cases of re-challenges, but
really very low percentages.
And what I noticed, I don't know if there really is a connection,
but I think that in the results,
which are very, very long,
at least re-challenges, maybe because
it actually continued for a long time after the recovery,
and then it was not a re-challenge,
but this result simply continued
without the re-evaluation.
Sasha, I just want to say
to everyone, actually, all the information
here is so important, and
what needs to be considered together, how can
this be published?
I don't know if as an article, as a summary, as an article,
but it's really, really important
that it will be available to the public
and in general
to the world of pharmacovigilance
in general, because
this is very important information.
It can be published over and over again.
The presentation does not have an answer.
I want to say,
I think, Emilia,
that it should be a part
of her and ours
to publish it together,
first of all, regarding the presentation,
who like you, is most eager to publish it
on the website of the Ministry of Health.
Yes, and it's not enough that
a presentation like this will really involve
silence, silence for the public, the public will know,
will receive all the doubts that exist
about the subject of the spontaneous speech,
the speech that comes personally
from the same person, which sometimes
there is also a subject of secondary gain,
but okay, and that's what you write in the article.
If I look closely, I must say that
our system is different here
because there is an awareness.
There is an awareness of the speaker,
it's not an anonymous speech.
So on the contrary, the speaker wants to speak?
No, but that means you can't put
thousands of quotes so that the speakers will be heard.
No, that was not my intention, really not.
Look, I still don't want to make a conclusion
because at the end of the day, there are a few things here,
there are the facts that are not consistent.
That is, if we thought that
a number of facts is a small number of lines,
what do we see here? I am currently talking
mainly about spontaneous speeches.
The free text, excuse me, the free text, everything is spontaneous,
but the free text, we will separate between
the system, according to the work
that the person writes on his own.
So there is a section here of the Secondary Game,
I will remind everyone of the phenomenon that was
at the time with the eltoxies, okay, that came and wrote
and so on and so forth, and it was very difficult
to separate the text from the text.
It was not clear how connected
to this new generic or
to the disease itself and so on.
But believe me, there are three things here that I would like to tell you.
The free text, the free text, there is no doubt,
and the main thing in my opinion,
is to share
Sharon,
Nachman Ash,
that is, I am currently also looking
at the joint hand of ours and yours
in order to continue this journey.
Do you want to continue it?
Do you want to?
I will take care of it.
Especially since there is such a large group of speeches
that are ongoing, that is, we do not really know
what will end there, and the free text
will really allow us to identify new phenomena
such as depression, hypostasis,
what are the types of disorders,
it is not in general to say that there are some disorders
in the middle, but really to understand
what are the types of disorders,
and I think that as we continue to the end,
our work will be bigger and more reliable,
and this work will really be possible,
Emilia, I think it is possible
to at least help us
to establish the causal connection,
because as soon as there is a re-challenge,
and as soon as there is a long speech
and there is a beginning that we know
when it will begin,
it is something that I think is the most difficult to do,
but this information, the content of this information,
will allow it.
So there is still some advantage that it is not only to identify
I also think that we need to emphasize
the society, because in the last time
that we at least had a discussion,
and there was a discussion about long speech,
they said they did not know about it,
so there is knowledge about it, and there is knowledge.
But I want to say something about, because first of all,
one of the things that is strong here is the re-challenge.
We know about long speeches.
In the case of Naranjo,
Naranjo, when there is a speech that returns
with the re-challenge, it jumps it
and turns it from possible
to definitive, to meaningful.
Here, here we also need to think
medically-collegally. Why medically-collegally?
Because not from the experiences that we said,
okay, it exists, there is a discussion,
and we can't deny it.
I want to think how we write it and how we present it
in the right way,
and not that it should be legal,
wait, wait, wait, you said that everything will be fine
and we can deny it. And here now,
describe what happened to me, the case continues.
Also the medical-collegally aspect,
before we wanted to understand it,
okay.
I would like to introduce all this to Sharon,
to see how we can advance this whole issue.
Sasha, this is an amazing job,
all of you, it is really...
You are simply amazing, I am really proud of you,
and it is important to continue this.
So there is an additional value to the system,
or...
I have to continue this.
I would like to say that I have to go down,
because we are having a discussion at the moment,
I have to go up with the presentations
and what we are going to present.
Thank you very much.
To you, Maati, to Sasha, to the entire medical team,
I would like to invite you, also when I write to Sharon,
I will talk to whoever needs it, I will also write,
Maati, so you will also have the cover, it is progressing.
Okay, great, thank you very much.
Amazing.
Thank you very much, and I would like to...
Don't come up to us.
I will go down, we will stay, okay?
Of course, of course.
Bye. Thank you.
Thank you.
I mean, there is this representation,
the sum of the presentations, I didn't notice that,
I didn't get to do it, the sum of the presentations of the children.
We talked about it earlier, that there were presentations,
there are presentations that were sent to everyone.
No, but I am talking about the sum, okay,
it is not in the form of a presentation,
it is not in the form of a presentation, but there is a sum of the presentations
and we have to go over the material,
we have to go over the material of the children and analyze it,
there were dozens of presentations,
dozens of presentations, not many,
and there, too,
we really have to come and do statistics,
although most of them were, I mean,
all the presentations that were in the children's world,
some were not allowed to be sent,
some were not allowed, there was no connection
between the selection and the presentation that was there,
that is also worth considering.
And some of them were also followed up.
And some of them were also followed up,
so it is up to you, Noah, to follow up,
but we will continue,
because the month is coming to an end,
Noah, will you pass the message, please?
Okay.
The question really is how it works,
because so far we have been receiving
every day,
and we are now collecting them,
and sending a summary every day,
it is true that now there are fewer and fewer,
but maybe with the increase of the selection,
the number of more presentations,
how do we do it?
As long as the summary is on the site,
we will have to strengthen it somehow.
I don't know what we will do,
it is really an important point.
I will tell you, Noah,
what is happening is that
there is a problem, personally,
in the whole section of the selection,
because there are some requirements
for genetics, and the doctor said
a very high amount of money,
today we can pay it,
but there are some requirements that are not met.
So, in the meantime,
Halila, Sasha, will receive the selection,
like Sharon, like Sarich,
from the only group of our people,
and all the others who are participating,
continue to receive the selection,
it is a great honor.
Maya is not directly selected from the group,
it is something else,
but we will see.
It will not take much time,
we will see.
No, but it also needs to be part of the conversation
of Mila and Sharon, she also needs to raise it,
so that it ends another week.
Yes, yes.
Sasha, anything else?
Yes, only a few things.
In the results of the Hikul system,
note that there was a slightly different distribution
in age groups,
and the group of small children
was much more significant in the old age group,
so it seems that the small children
are more likely
to suffer from this type,
and again, here too,
there were a few, this group of children
were shorter,
there was a small percentage
who were selected for the Levi results,
but there is still a small percentage
who were also selected for the Levi results
in the Hikul system, which continued
for over half a year, three months,
the group of over 12 months was smaller,
but these are also results
that should change quite quickly,
and in fact, the results
they were selected for,
there were small children,
small children,
here there were 5% of the results
for the Ritschallenge,
small children and small children
returned after another year,
and here I actually summarized what I said
about the results,
that the development in age groups and categories
was maintained most of the time,
wait a second, I want to dig here,
because these are the things that we really talked about
in the presentation process,
here I actually summarized the features
of the distribution of open fields,
which we have already seen that allows
in terms of the Ritschallenge,
the Ritschallenge is possible,
but the continuation and onset,
which I did not mention at the moment,
but there is also a lot of information on onset,
you can do some kind of comparison,
to see when each result begins,
when it ends, and so on,
and in fact we have signals or results
of the reporting rate,
as we saw in the presentation and the neurological results,
that's it,
I think there is a conclusion here,
I will show you the model, but there is a conclusion
of each of the categories that we talked about,
which we actually noted the 5 negative results,
which were 80% of the results,
in terms of the results in the last presentation,
we thought they were short-term results,
that's what the research shows so far,
and we found that more than 90% of the results,
in which there is some kind of long-term effect,
are based on long-term changes,
where 60% of this group
is based on a change of more than 3 months,
neurological results,
we actually noted new results
that do not appear in the patient,
such as ulcers, bruises,
hypostasis, peristesis,
all of which we already saw in the test,
and the same thing for this result,
68% of the results
that showed some kind of long-term effect,
appear for a long period of time,
the duration is longer than a month,
and what is longer than a month?
88% of those that were longer than a month,
were actually longer than 3 months.
So this is also something
that strengthens the baby's immune system,
we found that it is quite similar,
the results that appeared in the tests
are quite similar to what was shown in Alon,
we found the Back Pain,
which was very prominent in the tests,
so we found another result
that did not appear in Alon,
and again, the significant difference
was actually in the effect of the results,
that in Alon it was written in a way
that these results were supposed
to change within a few days,
and we saw that this was not the case,
because 50% of the results
that showed long-term effect,
were longer than half a year,
and the immune system is what we passed,
now I would like to talk a little about the limitations,
that actually the use of Medra,
was done after I tested the Mellel,
or even the Slenk in Hebrew,
which was written in a free text,
first I translated it into English,
and then into Medra,
and this is a slightly subjective process,
along with that, every person who works on Medra
does this process, even if he is a translator,
still the transition between natural language
and Medra,
is often subjective,
and it is very, very,
to be honest with yourself,
and really not to add information,
and not to draw conclusions on your own,
in the sense that this stage will be
a bit more complicated,
in terms of the decision to draw conclusions
on the On Setberry Challenge,
when I thought about it,
and the selection bias,
because it seems that
those who give this information in a debate,
it is really the people
who suffered from a phenomenon that is different
in terms of its duration, or in terms of intensity,
that is, there is something here that is...
Sasha, I need a moment to talk to you.
Sorry, I just had to go down
so I'm really sorry,
but the discussion was very interesting,
and we will continue.
Thank you.
I just want to say that
from the perspective of research,
let's say, if we want to interpret it as a statement,
we have a way, because the debates are agreed,
to control the disease,
and the people who say,
he gets a phenomenon that is very similar to the disease,
and we actually have the opportunity
to identify this element,
because it has a feeling for their symptoms,
and to treat the disease in that person,
but we know that the phenomenon is only the disease.
Right.
You don't have to go into their symptoms,
because you don't have to know
all the information about the corona virus.
You can make a guess there.
There is a place here,
not because I want to continue,
there is something here,
the disease did not end,
my wife was at home with corona,
since yesterday,
we came from the tunnel,
and yes, there is corona,
did they get better?
I don't know, I'm sure,
60 sure to get better,
I know they are getting better,
for sure, there is a place to continue,
mainly to see those who are getting better,
those who got to the hospital.
Another thing, Sasha,
what is the status of the development,
because at the moment,
the development of NRP is not final,
but really in final stages, right?
I will tell you Maya,
in order to develop the program,
so at first we gave him the software
that already exists with us,
I remember that there was a problem,
that the program actually received measurements,
received measurements,
but it did not know how to do it automatically,
because it is not enough
to learn the program,
so what I did,
I took it by hand,
I went to forums,
and I found the data that matches
the data that was missing,
and I added to it.
This is something that I did manually.
Now, when we worked with Torum,
we came to the conclusion that it is very difficult
and very difficult to do this manually,
and what he is developing now
is some system
that will also match all the measurements,
and then what remains for me to do
is to read the data
that appears in the data that we take from the forum,
and to match these data
with the correct measurements,
and so we will actually do a very, very big job
of, on the one hand, measuring in Hebrew
against measurements, now there is a problem,
because the table does not allow,
it cannot download it from the network,
it actually needs to be managed by a table,
and...
Do you think that in the section
that is supposed to be addressed to this,
there is a solution within the system?
There is, and in my opinion it is also complicated.
I need to talk with Inat.
Again, we have to work on this,
I know that you will ask Inat,
because I wanted to put it in our system.
Inat, we asked you, we asked you, there is no problem.
Because the previous time they told me that there is only one
manual for the Ministry of Health, which is with someone,
and actually, when I worked on the tables,
I adapted it manually from the system
of mapping the results to Vibe,
because there is a typo and all sorts of things.
So right now,
it will open at the end of this week,
or next week, actually to establish
this system to our authority, which includes
both the forums and the tables.
I told him that the table is not available,
so we need to think about how to solve it.
Sasha, we need to have a conversation,
No, I do see that he is very busy,
but I think he understands very well
what we want, and he is really
a very generous and open-minded person.
He works on it,
it's just a complex development,
and it's all that has been added
is already lost. But this development
can use us for endless things.
Noa, think about it,
even though I traveled to all the forums,
I saw a lot of reports about the vaccination,
a lot, only that they didn't really come to us
the way we know it, but if we...
I have a request,
and let's go.
I hope we can also add more vaccines,
in the first stage,
so that the public can talk.
I'm happy
if there are recommendations
for changes in the vaccine,
changes or additions,
or something from your attempt
to work with this vaccine and the data you receive,
what things do you recommend
to change, or add, or remove,
I would be happy.
The best idea, we would be happy to be the center
that opens the data
and brings it to you, no problem.
We don't open it, it's all a matter of privacy,
we don't open it, we close it.
Close it, exactly, close it, in the eye.
Yes, yes, to continue the process as it is,
Noah, look, Emilia is very busy,
here we need to consider
the importance of joint action between them.
Yes, I know.
If we...
Let's try, I'll also speak from my side
with those who need it, with the relatives.
I'll try, but it depends on the direction.
I think it's in a way,
it's super important,
and I think Sharon knows about it.
I think she will support it.
Now, now, I also have to...
Just one word, Mati.
When it comes to the vaccine, I think it's a very popular vaccine,
and it's important that we have the information
if we want to do different things.
What I do think is that no one wants to...
the awareness of this vaccine.
I see that there is some effort
for a special vaccine, for example.
I understand that she has done a lot more work
to encourage it to her relatives,
to her relatives in terms of, for example, different vaccines.
It means that...
As long as the theory, if the theory is wrong,
we want to return the data to them, it can still be.
I think it's important that they agree on the results
and not on the results of yours.
It's very important.
What you're doing now, Sasha, is super, super important.
It means that there are cups
that keep the information close to their axis.
No, the truth is that we get the reports
directly from the cups,
and that's by the team.
How do they increase the awareness
that there is such a vaccine
that anyone can fill?
I think that when they get a vaccine somewhere,
each one is able to get a corona vaccine
in the cup,
and they get a vaccine in the cup,
because today...
Why would anyone do that?
It's important in the system,
we simply need to send an automatic text message.
Anyone who receives a text message,
we need to receive a text message immediately.
We should have a conversation with the cups
on the subject of vaccines in the cup,
so we'll also talk about it.
It's very important.
There are no tests between the cups.
I think that we're announcing
the presentation of a film recipe.
In the first session,
I think we need to define a date.
We're looking at the current situation,
and we...
We have a number of people
who are coming to check.
Yes, Maia, we noticed that
you only took one out of five categories,
but I also saw
all kinds of tests
and medical results
that were, in some cases, more accurate
than the others.
But there's also something to investigate.
It's really some kind of software
that only detects what it tells us.
And you can also leave it much more.
To reach a more accurate profile,
even more accurate security
of the vaccine than what's known so far.
Because from the reports, I understand that
there are more things to be discovered
than what we know.
Can you tell us the current situation?
It's two, three, four.
We have endless conflicts
with the people of the site
regarding the meeting,
and we're not ready to make a decision.
We want someone to make a decision
because our website is posting so many discussions
and presentations.
So, it's there. Sharon is aware of that.
She knows that all the presentations are ready,
and she wants to make a decision.
No, I'm saying that maybe it's impossible
to upload the presentation right now,
to upload the presentation on the site.
I talked to Amelia about that.
I think it's a good idea to make one presentation
by the end of May.
From now on, I don't think we'll get much more.
There are five or six per day.
Until the end of May.
It starts at the beginning of December,
and it's until the end of May.
It's important to upload now,
even though we had a lot of...
Can you move this presentation to...
Who helped you? Noam?
Was it Noam who helped you with the presentation?
No, it was Alon who made the presentation.
No, no, it wasn't a presentation.
It wasn't a presentation for people with disabilities.
It was a presentation for the public.
Within this forum,
it's a presentation for the public.
Maybe we should ask him.
What do you think about that?
It could be that what we have here
is a way to use it instead of doing it again.
But really, Noa, this presentation,
the presentation I made for March,
was much more complicated and complicated
with what you see in the graphics,
because I knew you were in the public.
I didn't expect any coincidence or explanation,
because I knew we'd talk, and I knew I'd talk to you,
that you have access to...
I think it's a bit of a loss
for the public,
and they didn't understand much of it.
You need to explain a bit more what you see
and how it works.
I missed some of what you said,
because something happened with the speakers,
but I think it's a good idea
to make a presentation
that ends in half a year.
I don't know if you'll be able to do that.
I don't know what...
I'll try, Noa,
but I really don't understand
how to do the presentation until the end.
So in the meantime,
I think it's better that you focus on the presentation
and the presentation.
We're looking for someone to do it.
Okay.
I'll try to summarize
the entire presentation.
It's just to add a bit of text
and some of the things.
It might be less relevant to the public.
Okay.
Thank you.
Wow, amazing. Great job.
I feel like we're experiencing
a great experience
that we don't forget.
But you know,
if you look at
the
results,
and what appears in very high numbers,
it's very consistent with what we get from the results.
It's great to see.
Yes.
And also, according to the numbers,
it really matches the results of the presentation.
That's right.
As soon as the numbers increase,
it means that we're all doing something right.
And then it gives you strength,
which is also important.
You can move forward in the business of statistics,
right.
I'm very happy
that I can go down in resolution.
I can look at the results
and how long they last.
That's right.
For me, it's very interesting
that I can't do that.
It's on the level of what we get
from the results,
but it's on a different level,
but it's really very interesting,
because when someone comes and asks,
tell me, what did you hear
from some young woman?
So it's very difficult to find it.
It's very difficult to find what was the resolution.
It's very impressive.
I also don't know if Rishut can do it,
but I think
it's okay.
Because it's not the U.S.
and we don't have all the money
to buy the link.
In the meantime, it's okay.
In the meantime, we succeeded
in completing all the slides.
Thank you very much.
I want to talk about
how we continue to work
and how we continue to work.
Maya, thank you. Sasha, thank you.
It was really fun to work with you.
I really hope it won't be
and that it will be,
and we will continue to cooperate
with you. Maya, for me
it's a gift. I also learn a lot.
I'm not from the field, so for me
it's a very big bonus.
It's good.
I want to thank you and Sasha
for coming to us
and for making this possible.