How to prevent commercial air hijackings

This is BACKGROUND info on the disable idea.... some old thoughts that I went through in thinking about this...and deleted text from the main article

Be sure to read: How to prevent air hijackings as that is the official document.

(described in detail), but it's longer term. SAFE mode, would be extremely effective on fly-by-wire planes (Airbus, 777, etc). Yet SAFE mode (which is not much more than a "stuck" auto-pilot switch!) would still be useful a useful hijacking deterrent in older models (where auto-pilot can be "physically" overridden) because 1) in the event the pilots are killed, there is a chance it would save the plane and 2) at a minimum, it would tie up 2 terrorists who would have to be in the cockpit 100% of the time to override the controls (they would also have to be more skilled pilots than the 9/11 hijackers).

All modern day commercial aircraft have GPS systems and virtually all are capable of landing on autopilot. So why not put “panic” buttons mounted in the cockpit (one on each side of the cockpit) and a panic keypad in crew areas (one on each side of the plane in the forward and aft cabins) that put the plane into a SAFE mode. Once a plane is in SAFE mode, if the pilot deviates significantly (in altitude or direction) from the primary pre-arranged flight plan (or from three pre-programmed alternates that the pilot can choose from due to weather, air traffic, or airport closures), the auto-pilot automatically will temporarily engage just long enough to put the plane back on course, even landing the plane (using ILS) if necessary. We've had the technology to do this for years... in fact, it exists on virtually all commercial planes.... it's called the "gosh darn, the auto-pilot engage switch is stuck." On fly-by-wire aircraft, it can be done in a way that cannot be over-ridden by the pilot... Airbus planes keep a pilot from doing anything "fishy" (by engaging the autopilot temporarily, exactly as we suggest here) and this mode is active 100% of the time! But in all other planes, even if they are not fly-by-wire, the "stuck autopilot"  becomes a nuisance to a hijacker (who must man the cockpit as well as be an excellent pilot) and a potential lifesaver to those in the plane (if the pilot is killed and the hijacker doesn't know how to fly the plane).

There is also a good argument for randomly locking in one of the nearest airports (chosen at random when SAFE mode is enabled and after electronically querying the airport to ensure that the weather is good and which runway to land on and if no response/"bad weather" response from the airport, the system will try another airport so that the choice of airport is done automatically)...it gives the hijackers much less time to think and it avoids weather problems (although fuel dumping might be an issue). In crowded areas such as JFK, the "allowed zone" would be very tight, i.e., the closer you get to the ground, the less tolerance you'd have so that it would be impossible to hit any buildings (all commercial planes are required by the FAA to have building height info by 2002).

All modern day planes have GPS systems and are capable of landing on autopilot. So put "SAFE mode" panic buttons mounted in the cockpit (one on each side of the cockpit) and (optionally) in crew areas (one on each side of the plane in the forward and aft cabins) that put the plane on forced autopilot that cannot be overridden (except as specified below). Once a plane is in SAFE mode, it will randomly choose from the 5 nearest airports capable of accommodating that plane type, and land it. 

This technique works because you take both the pilots and the terrorists out of a control situation. A terrorist can no longer threaten the pilot to "do this or I will kill people" because the terrorist knows that the pilot can't accommodate the demand no matter what. So the terrorist can't get what he wants...the only thing he can do is kill all the people on the plane...and if he just wanted to kill people, bus hijackings are MUCH easier than plane hijackings. Bottom line: no more motivation to hijack a plane. In fact, it's worse than hijacking a bus because in the plane case, the hijacker is completely locked up and directly transported to a random jail location that the hijacker can't plan for.

Here are a few details (there are lots of different variations of the same general idea):

Optional variations:

Don't we ever learn? We keep focusing on airport security... but it is the wrong place to put our energies for two reasons: (a) It's just too hard to be perfect and (b) there are easy ways to make airplanes undesirable targets. In fact, we could have had perfect security in this case and it still would not have prevented the incident because the knives used were made of ordinary material and are easily concealed and virtually impossible to detect. Unless we do something quite different from what we've been doing in the past, what happened on Sept 11, will happen again.

So we've got to think of a different angle from the way we've been thinking in the past.

Do you every hear about bus hijackings? train hijackings? Do you go through metal detectors and screening questions when you board a bus or a train?

The idea above would make it as unattractive to hijack a plane as it is to hijack a bus.

 

Optional variations/refinements (not as good as the preferred idea above)

In older planes (i.e., not the fly by wire planes), a terrorist who got inside the cockpit could use the mechanical throttle to bring the plane down in an unsafe manner.

Many other variations are possible. This is just a sampling. Just doing the simple basic idea above would probably make airlines one of the least attractive vehicles for a terrorist.

We already have the technology to do autopilot landings, avoid ground obstacles, and there are transponder codes a pilot can enter to indicate that the plane is being hijacked (this happened in this case).

Hit Counter